Sunday, November 05, 2006

Saddam faces death penalty

Hey,i never thought I would see the day,they sentence Saddam to death.By the looks of it,he deserved it after what he did to the kurds and the other Iraqis.His action were condemned by humanitarians everywhere.What I just don't get it is that why didn't they remove Saddam from power after the first Gulf war in the first place?If a leader created a war for his/her selfish purposes,shouldn't he/she be impeached from presidency?But do Saddam really deserve to die as some people may say?

If there is a leader that is doing more harm to the country whether economically or environmentally or rather tarnishing the country's reputation,shouldn't the citizens find themselves a new leader?If the government is corrupted,shouldn't they go on an uprising and create a revolution to toppled the current corruption?

They said to give people a second chance but for a leader,a leader has a very big responsibility and if he/she abuse their power of leadership,he/she will never be trusted by their people again.Saddam has a second chance to redeem himself when the first gulf war ended.He had the time to seek forgiveness from his people.He had the time to step down from his postion to be remorseful for his action and he had the money to rebuild his country.I wonder who's the moron who put him into power?

There should be a saying that you should never vote a big fat liar for a leader.You should never give a compulsive gambler who does learn from his mistake some money.Saddam is one big example of this.

If corruption prevents the people freedom,then seize it with force an shatter them to pieces.Umm am I talking nonsense again?I rpobably don't give a though to the words above.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home